| Blogs > touch213 > My Blog |
|
can you see the difference ?? some say True "Love".. some say "Love" now can it be love if it's not true..?? then if it cannot .. all love is then "true".. which is the factor that makes it love.. is there anything that's true.. that is not love ? so why can't we just simply Love.. and stop adding the disclaimer of "True before Love".. ?? when one adds True before love.. could that easily be a signifier.. that a person is selfish in the perception of what is Love ?? and would not that.. imply that a person is with a great many conditions, that becomes a constriction upon love ?? maybe we have to be careful how we say what we say ?? it does reveal much .. when it's considered ... |
|||
5/30/2007 1:16 pm |
most of the time.. it's just a matter of taking time to comprehend.. that we may understand and gather a perspective.. and we often can then .. speak freely..  it flows, then in it's own simplicity of expressiveness. wouldn't you think.. ?I think many of the love searches.. happen sometimes in the descriptive comment below: problem is everyone is "living scared"... trying to protect and cover their back side.. when there is not even an attack being waged.. this is how people look for love: "it's kind like people are walking through a Rose Garden with an AK47.. " pissed off because all the Roses are pretty.. and they don't know which one to shoot... strange they never thought.. to simple appreciate them as they walk past.. and marvel at the pure beauty of them.. and simply doing so .. they'd know choosing one.. is choosing something beautiful..
| ||
5/30/2007 4:13 pm |
Mr. Right or Miss Right.. goes so far past love that it left it standing in it's tracks.. because Mr. or Miss right.. is so relative to the socio-economic's of an environment.. love on the other hand.. exist as it exist without regard of socio-economic variables.. wouldn't that not be true in the fable of the Princess and the pauper.. or the tale of the Hatfield and the McCoys.. X... I understand your perspective.. but sometime quantifiers and signifier's.. do just that.. they quantify and signify something .. and that carries many inferences.. but for the sake of your point in a non specific forum as blogs.. your point is well taken in such context.
| ||
5/30/2007 4:16 pm |
but.. I've seen such uttered by many who have great command of the English language and such one has "verbally" reprimanded me on the language quite often..  although to no avail.. but nevertheless.. they issued their reprimand..
| ||
5/30/2007 6:20 pm |
"ain't" and "Y'all" to me these are great american words.. they get the point conveyed very effectively.. but no I did not do the corner thing... the Hatfield & McCoy references was not relative to the economic spectrum that was more relative to the cultural disparities of community standing and family rivalry.. of which.. my inference is to denote that "love" transcended across even the family rivalry spectrum.. we may not even know if the controversy was relative to their background ethnicities.. but we do know they feuded.. and it did not stop the fact that love crossed those bounds. that gene seems to have been quite infectious.. 
| ||
5/30/2007 6:23 pm |
Because it certainly takes plenty of "action" to keep love alive for a lifetime. so, would you say.. "certainly" replaces " truly".. 
| ||
5/30/2007 7:05 pm |
| ||
|
Touch, Right, dont use too much adjectives b4 nouns or loves. LOL. Is it how we say what we say so important? I care more how we do and feel, the facts speak louder than words. Dont be trapped. Good luck, touch? how's yr guitar?
|
