| Blogs > beyondfantasy3 > Many Perspectives of Attitude |
|
As a man who is 50+ do you think the most reasonable age for a woman for you to be above 32? Do you think many woman under the age of 32 has the will and dedication to actually invest themselves in a potentially long term relationship ? do you think many women mostly only learn to respect a relationship until after they have been burned by their games? Do you think many don't truly learn to have a healthy respect for what it takes to make a relationship work and last until they have past the age of 30+ ? Do you think there is a age spectrum that is more suitable for women to truly respect a relationship ? |
|||
|
probably very realistic... often times, young women are very unstable when it comes to truly investing themselves in relationships.
| ||
|
I do thank you for engaging the blogs, although I do have some level of disagreement as to: The premise and conclusion as to the experience you state, the result; invalidates the statement, that: "Asian Woman know what they want". If they did as an exclusivity characteristics, you would not have gotten burned. I say that to simply disagree, based on the claim of exclusivity in singling out Asian woman, as being exceptional vs other women. " They are not above nor are they more of anything in a concept of exclusivity", they are simply women, who are Asian and function within an environment of Asian culture that has multiple thousands if not millions of ways, they live within the expanse of the population and its multi variable cultural mix. . Women are women, given the situation, circumstance many women do many things. In any nation and in any place within nations, where economic shortfall is present, many women will claim many allegiances, but many of the same allegiance can quickly become to fail, if and when and at such points that (some) women feel economically stable. At such point, many can and many do change their allegiance quickly. equally so, at that point many even move to make the claim, 'they no longer need a man". such claim then tells another truth of the women who speaks such; it simply identified her as one who made allegiance driven by economic aims of stability and security, and once she has found a means to secure such, aside from the man, then the man becomes a dispensable element. This by every definition, becomes under some terms, "gold digger", but in the commonality of definition, it is nothing more than a form of pros#i%ution. When and at the point and time that a woman, comes to love, simply for the sake of love, then that is the woman, who is able to make an allegiance, based on love. Men must guard against the 'situational aims" of women, but to do so first men must observe, listen and be of attentions to the elements of character of the woman, far and beyond the antic's of seductive caricature. BEING CAUTIOUS IS A GREAT THING TO EMBRACE.... ( a wise choice of considerations to do and be)
|
