| Blogs > lxqizi > My Blog |
|
"Who can say that Putin to step down." "Who can say that Putin to step down." Here is Russia, who would say Putin to step down? In the past few months, Russia's oil wealth funds lost nearly one hundred billion U.S. dollars, the budget deficit, director of strategic analysis at Russia's Nikolaev said FBC believes the BRIC countries, Russia, the economic crisis affected the most. "Polar bear" can get out as soon as the economic crisis, its economy is real gold or gold-plated, pending test of time. When the high-speed development of the Russian economy was teetering on the economic crisis, people ask, who should be responsible for today's economic predicament. Over the past 10 years to grasp power of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin of Russia has once again become the cusp of the characters. According to poll data show that as of the end of August this year, 84 percent of Russians agreed with Putin as president of business activities, 67% of respondents agreed with Medvedev as prime minister of business activities. And in August 2013, the rate was 63 percent support for Putin, Medvedev's support rate was 51%. The researchers believe that the two of them support a substantial increase in the rate, first attributed to "Crimea effect." According to reports, the above-mentioned opinion poll was in 2014 August 22 to 25, in from Russia 46 regions, 134 settlements conducted among 1,600 people. And public opinion polling organization in Russia believe that prompted Putin's support rate rose for two main reasons: First, Russia successfully hosted the Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia and achieved unprecedented success in the history of the Olympic Games. Second, because the Ukrainian political chaos, civil war and secession threats facing misery and Russia, "the scenery here is good," the reality in stark contrast. Russia's success in the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi undoubtedly made a "dazzling achievement," President Putin has greatly increased his personal charisma and political capital. Western media have ridiculed the Sochi Winter Olympics is "Putin's Olympics" that Russia faces a variety of security and economic difficulties, it is impossible to run the Winter Olympics. But when the Russians held a really best Winter Games in history, the Western media will no longer mention "Putin's Olympics" because they clearly see that Putin is paid to run the Winter Olympics in Sochi efforts to bear rich fruits. Putin's political turmoil in Ukraine is an important reason to get people to trust. Last November, Ukraine outbreak "Revolution Square" since the Russian people on the political developments in Kiev is extremely concerned about the situation. All-Russian Research Center public opinion poll results showed that: nearly half of Russian citizens believe that Ukraine protests provoked by Western secret services. I believe this is the first in over 60 years of age of the respondents (49  , the Russian Communist Party supporters and the "Just Russia" party supporters. Survey results show that Ukraine incident touched the hearts of the Russian people. Most Russians expressed concern about events in Ukraine, where 26% of people continue to focus political situation, 47% of people regularly informed of the latest situation. The Russian people, the political environment in Ukraine and Russia similar to similar to a certain extent, reflects the trends and development prospects of Russia's political situation. Most of the Russian people to respond to the President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych in Kiev "Revolution Square" ways critics that it is precisely because of his national security concerns at the crucial moment, the self-preservation, to abandon the principle, only to Ukrainian political crisis of increasingly heavier . Yanukovych in corrupt and weak political incompetence led to the secession of Ukraine plunged into the woods. Yeltsin country experienced a political crisis in Ukraine Russian people have a more profound understanding of the crisis, in their view, it is precisely because Putin advocated such "national supremacy", stressing that "national consciousness" to safeguard "national stable" leadership people, Russia will "scenery here is fine," the people's happiness index will rise. Who can say that Putin to step down Russia was because international oil prices skyrocketing and among the "BRIC", not only dramatically improve people's lives, and its domestic and foreign affairs is showing a rare strong. Single-handedly led the country to regain confidence in Russia's Vladimir Putin, the Russian human mind naturally become an indispensable leader. However, oil prices fell, the situation of the global financial crisis, the rapid deterioration of the Russian economy, reports on Putin challenged slowly emerge. But the Russian people really want to abandon the political strongman it? Putin's real power status can not shake Putin's relationship with incumbent President Dmitry Medvedev became the focus of world attention, the Western media began to stir Crisis, perhaps, in the West seems relatively gentle personality than Medvedev, Putin's tough personality more favorable to them. Associate Professor, Department of Journalism of Moscow State University Lyudmila said: "Now the unemployment rate surged, the stock market entered a bear market, grievances sky, but nevertheless, the Russians still have great hopes for Putin, hoping he can revive the economy. As Mape relationship, most Russians believe there have been cracks and contradictions between them, mainly because he is a scapegoat Medvedev believes Putin past mistakes of economic policy. "For Putin to step down on the western stir, Lyudmila, said:" This is Russia, who would say Putin to step down? . " In fact, as long as an overview Medvedev since he took office, with Putin performance and attitude on major issues, it can be seen, remove some of the Western media stir on the so-called contradictions in Russian politics this most special of two team, They stand more to maintain a high degree of consistency. Test Mape combination of economic crisis, but the Russian people, one pair of them, represents hope, all-powerful Putin, perhaps more than the lack of Putin's government more trustworthy. (Reprint) |
|||
|
Anyone would attack No matter how you are the best. . Putin is a great leader Inevitably been criticized and attacked You're lucky Have you been to the former Soviet Union? That was a very great country. Their culture and the arts and sciences have a lot of creativity. .
| ||
|
anyone can have their choice of advocacy for Putin... He is in power because his plan promised the already wealthy more wealth, and provided for those who gained wealth through the crimes of their past, to keep their wealth. No longer are the wealthy so eager to support someone, who's promise has gone sour and just as you stated. "Russia's oil wealth funds lost nearly one hundred billion U.S. dollars" These same wealthy people, will themselves have him taken down, if they continue to loose money at the rate they are loosing it. The voice of the mass people is far less important, than the voice of the power elite. The same as it is in many countries. but Russia is Russia, they won't publicize their intenet to dismiss or bring the demise of Putin, when they take the chance of mind to do it, they will do it. Those who profited from the Olympic construction, have put those dollars away, and if there is not another dollar making venture to benefit them. They will have no loyalty for the past money made on the construction work they profited from with Sochi. People with big money has an "allegiance to money", not individuals, they will flip and switch based on who can help them make it, and they will turn on that same person if that person is the cause of them loosing it. Putin is well aware of that fact, because that's how he operates. He has promised them something to be gained by invasion and take over; but those things have not produced fruit, and may not produce fruit but instead increase the hardships of the wealthy, in loosing more money. It does not make him great to be a bully and brutal aggressor. That is fantasy for those who favor 'bully based arrogance", and mistake it for progressive leadership. True leaders pursue peace building coalitions, and coalition that stand against human abuse, and stand against bully and terrorist acts. Putin aligns himself with China, because China pushes hard because it is not only despaired to need additional resources, it is also despaired to try and find means to sustain 7-8% growth, at any expense. but the cost is 'in the manner they alienate the rest of the world, and over time, the world community will stand against both. China is slowly burning many bridges, with is flooding of other markets and attacking markets in other lands. It is engaged in high level hacking and spying to steal intellectual property and nations various secrets. None of such things will serve China nor Russia well in the long term. It's like putting wealth in the hands of Teenagers and very young adults, they will become arrogant, aggressively intrusive, and boastful and think themselves invincible. This is the principle of Power Corrupts, and money become the roots of many evils. The Global Humanitarian concerns are missing in both Russia and China. Even the British Empire when it was vast, did not forget to hold some semblance of Global Humanitarianism; even when it engaged in brutal methods in other areas, it set up to have policy within its structure of humanitarian aspirations. Over time, it relinquished various sovereignty in various lands, and crafted instead trade agreements and autonomy to some that it previously had dominated. Russia and China does not have that character. Even today, in Hong Kong, there is unrest, because China can't keeps its mainland hands out of Hong Kong political process, yet it expect to continue to benefit from the capitalism of Hong Kong. This is a rift that won't go away anytime soon. In the long term, Mainland China may find its damage too great to repair. The more wealth China claims, the more aggressive it becomes in the region, contesting and challenging claims that have been dormant for decades and beyond. It stands against the UN and its aims on too many issues, and it challenges the same nations it relies upon for exportation benefits and gains. could you imagine Zuckerberg's Facebook trying to fight Apple, Windows, and Google.. they would have buried him and facebook. he was smart enough to know that the only way to win and retain the stature to be among them, was to work with them. Not against them. what would become of China if it suffered a 3-5 drop of 3-4% loss of growth figures. Inflation would grip the nation, the wealthy will loose 100's upon 100's of billions, and the Maintenance cost to upkeep its infrastructure will tax its resources and deplete its reserves to a level unfathomable by the current day Chinese mindset. Go back and look at the history of Spain, Look at the history of Argentina and look at the fall of Rome, the Fall of Greece and many other powers that have lost what they thought they had. Only 30 yrs ago, the Japanese thought it was the king of the world, in exports and other things, Today, only the quality level high tech and the automotive is a consistent performing aspect of Japans Industrial sectors. Yet, resources dependence is extremely high, so it had to tone down it's rhetoric. with many nations and back off its aggression in manner with many nations. it is a wrongful thing to underestimate the European and British, the Nordic Regional Group and the American West.
| ||
|
Actually I am in the FSU right now on business. My 10th time in this country. I was having dinner with a local family at their home. Nice home. Very spacious and strongly middle income in a country reported to be the 4th poorest in the world. He was an electrician and she was a teacher. 50's. Both in their They know I stay neutral in my comments so they are very open in their talks with me. I asked them when was or is their best time, economically and socially. They said during the 1980's, the decade before the collapse, during Perestroika. You do not know a lot of history You do not have to experience to more. . I can understand you Why do I say Because of the impact you receive And I do not like I have a lot of direct experience first-hand. .
| ||
|
Your data is the fact that You are very objective This is your big advantage I agree
| ||
|
And you do not know me. My Mother was Tajik and my Father from the Ukraine in Soviet military. I was born in Central Asia and moved to US when I was 15. Further educated in the US. I know more than you think. Be careful. So this is I certainly do not know of these cases you Thank you for telling me. . This is entirely coincidental But I have no contact with political issues But in my childhood was spent together with Soviet experts for some days, Watch a lot of Soviet films, will sing a lot of songs,, the Soviet Union I love that ethnic songs and dances and movies and art Too many memories of childhood,, very good,,,, I can only tell you that a person,,, You will understand,,,,
| ||
|
Thanks for explaining. It is clear now. Sometimes language can be a barrier to understanding. It becomes clear when people spend time and energy trying to communicate. Thank you. People can communicate, communicate As long as you are willing to,, This is not a problem Think about it We talk to pets communicate Could not communicate with the man himself do?
| ||
|
We Chinese had one good words: long live understanding!
|
