| Blogs > ParadiseWriter > Insert Silly Blog Name Here |
|
China bans news sourcing from social media https://www.hongkongfp.com/2016/07/12/china-bans-news-sourcing-social-media/ China’s Cyberspace Administration, the top level Internet regulator, has banned news outlets from citing social media messages as sources. The new policy is part of an ongoing crackdown on “fake” news and rumors. All media outlets received an official notice of the ban in early July, according to press release posted on the Administration’s website late on the evening of July 3. The press release, which quoted several cases of “fabricated news” circulated online, said authorities had penalized one dozen online news outlets including Sina, Caijing, Tencent, and NetEase and forced them to delete a number of columnists’ accounts due to their use of social media sources. The notice stressed: "要求各网站始终坚持正确舆论导向，采取有力措施，确保新闻报道真实、全面、客观、公正，严禁盲目追求时效，未经核实将社交工具等网络平台上的内容直接作为新闻报道刊发。[..] 各网站要落实主体责任，进一步规范包括移动新闻客户端、微博、微信在内的各类网络平台采编发稿流程，建立健全内部管理监督机制。严禁网站不标注或虚假标注新闻来源，严禁道听途说编造新闻或凭猜测想象歪曲事实。" "All websites must adhere to the correct guidelines on channeling public opinion and adopt measures that ensure the news reports are true, comprehensive, objective and fair. The race to break news stories by using unverified facts distributed via social media platforms is forbidden. […] All websites should take responsibility for managing mobile news services as well as Weibo, WeChat and others to make sure that editorial flows are being monitored. Websites are strictly prohibited from quoting from unnamed or fake news sources and fabricating news based on hearsay, guesswork or imagination." Two days later, commentary published by state news agency Xinhua advocated even more severe punishment for media outlets that failed to implement the new policy. The post has been widely distributed on social media, with many messages echoing the negative impact of fabricated news on the society. The Cyberspace Administration mentioned various stories that included “false” news, with headlines such as: Two killed and ten injured in bus arson in Changsha After Wei Zexi incident, Letters and Complaints Bureau sets up a green channel for about 100 patients suffering from the same illness Shanghai girl runs away from Jiangxi village during Lunar New Year -in-law from city flips the dinner table in hometown village during Lunar New Year The first two news items were fabricated from pre-existing news stories. For example, the bus arson was rewritten from a news report back in 2010. The latter two cases were short stories published online to stimulate discussion about gender relations in China, but were then mischaracterized by media outlets as real incidents. There are certainly cases in which journalists have failed to verify facts taken from social media, but what the Cyberspace Administration intentionally ignores is the positive impact of sourcing news from social media. Take the Wei Zexi incident, which was sourced from social media. Wei was a 21-year-old college student who died in April of synovial sarcoma, but not before his family spent thousands on a phony treatment that exacerbated his condition. They had based the decision on what they thought was a search result on Baidu, the dominant Internet search engine in China, but was actually an advertisement. This particular story, which included video testimony from Wei taken shortly before he died, led to widespread discussion about the problem of search engine advertisement practices and the disorder of the Chinese health system. Eventually, the Cyberspace Administration stepped in to tighten the regulations on advertising on search engines. baidu. Chang Ping, a prominent Chinese journalist who now resides in Germany, pointed out that though some “fabricated” stories are indeed spread by online media outlets, most of them are just sensational local news that have little to no consequences when compared to government-fabricated news that affect the country’s development: 从历史上看，离政府越近的媒体越容易造假，更不用说政府直接控制的媒体，比如人民日报、新华社及中央电视台，从小麦亩产万斤到天安门广场没有发生过“六四”屠杀，从人民公社万万岁到伟大的中国梦，从无产阶级专政到依法治国，无一日不在谎言之中。 From a historical perspective, media outlets that are close to government have a higher tendency to fabricate news. The track record of state-controlled media outlets is even worse. For example, the China Daily, Xinhua News and Chinese Central Television have been producing lies that claim that 10,000 catty of wheat were grown on one mu [0.667 hectare] [during Mao Zedong’s socioeconomic program called the Great Leap Forward], the June 4 massacre never happened in Tiananmen [in 1989], that promote the glory of the People’s Collective Communes, the glory of the China Dream, the dictatorship of the proletariat [Maoist political theory during the Cultural Revolution] and rule by law [under current Chinese President Xi Jinping]. Since April 2015, the Cyberspace Administration has been introducing a series of policies to tighten control of online portals and news sites. Blogger Lanjinger compiled a timeline: • 4月28日国家网信办发布“约谈十条”，网站存在未及时处置违法信息情节严重等9种情形的，企业相关负责人将被约谈，约谈整改不力的网站将被吊销许可证。9种情形将被约谈，并约谈了百度、腾讯。 • 去年10月24日，国家网信办召开各界人士座谈会，讨论“全面推进网络空间法治化。 • 今年5月6日，国家互联网信息办公室依法批准了人民网、新华网等6家中央重点新闻网站157个地方频道的开设申请。 • 6月21日，国家网信办召开全国跟帖评论专项整治视频会议，部署集中治理跟帖评论存在的突出问题，指出，跟帖评论乱象扰乱信息传播秩序、破坏网络舆论生态，人民群众深恶痛绝，必须下大力气整治。 • 6月28日国家互联网信息办公室发布”APP管理规定”，加强对移动互联网应用程序（App）信息服务的规范管理，促进行业健康有序发展，保护公民、法人和其他组织的合法权益。 • April 28, 2015: The Cyberspace Administration announced “10 rules for interviews.” The rules demanded that website administration attend “an interview” with authorities after the sites fail to manage illegal information. There are nine scenarios listed in the rules and for those sites which fail to improve their management after the interview, their business license can be cancelled. • October 24, 2015: The Cyberspace Administration held a roundtable with representatives of the industry to discuss “the implementation of rule of law on cyberspace.” • May 6, 2016: The Cyberspace Administration granted six state-controlled websites including Renminwang and Xinhua net permission to operate provincial news channels. [The local news licensing system has made illegal other provincial news channels operated by all other portal websites. The six licensed sites are Renminwang, Xinhua, China Radio International, China Daily, Guangmingwang and China National Radio.] • June 21, 2016: The Cyberspace Administration held a national video conference on the clean-up of news comment threads to draw up a plan in dealing with news comments on social media. The authorities said the news comments on social media have disrupted the order of online information distribution, the online opinion ecology. People hate such phenomena and more management effort is needed. • June 28, 2016: The Cyberspace Administration announced the app management regulation to tighten management of Internet applications, to enhance the healthy development of the sector and to protect the rights of citizens, legal entities and other organizations. [The regulation demanded real-name registration of app users. There are more than 4 million applications on app stores in China.] The current crackdown on online news and social media news comments is consistent with the broader ideological struggle under President Xi Jinping, who wants to restore the Chinese Communist Party’s leadership in both new and conventional media. ["One of the deep secrets in life is that all that is really worth doing is what we do for others." |
||||
|
I think its a good idea, because we have so many website claiming to report news and only push wild and expanded opinions that are unverified. Social responsibility is a part of what is freedoms. We need to understand that freedom does not mean do anything you want any way you want. It means do what you do, responsibly and with a socially responsible conscience, then one has that freedom to do so. China is smart in the sense that if it does not hold its media to a responsible role they can drive the people into chaotic frenzy, as is so in the American Media, with pundits pushing agenda, for the sake of "drama making" all in the pursuit of advertising revenue by how many they can attract to their drama. We can see the insanity of coverage the media gives Trump, just to push the madness he speaks, for the sake of controversial drama. They are irresponsible, because all the "gullible", and short attention span people who have selective amnesia are driven by the "drama of the day". Fact don't matter, they just seek out the drama fix and start into their spins.
| |||
|
China has a Billion plus people, they cannot afford the chaos created by internet madness.. Here, one can click on a link and the headline and picture has nothing to do with where the link leads. There is shallow stories because true Journalism can only be found in a few select and highly dignified web sites. Those whom respect their integrity to present a story. They are fewer than one would think. We lag in Internet, we lag in Internet Speed, South Korea makes ours look like poor quality childs play, and Japan has too made us look like beginners in the way it functions and the speed. They can do more with their phones than many in America can do with a laptop or desktop. Many of the Asian nations have capitalized on internet and cell tech, and they have a far superior system of data transfer than we have,. I applaud China for holding the reigns on the run wild madness which exist here with internet. When I've traveled, I look at the way they use tech, they are far advanced in how they integrate it. They are more advanced in how they integrate tech and labor, because they are smart enough to know their people need to work, to build a system that is sustainable. America does not have a sense of respect for Legacy, because its history is so vile in so many ways with racism and bigotry, greed and avarice. China has long history and it respect Legacy, it will not sell it marquee companies to some foreign entity. In American, anything is for sale. We are not even smart enough to manage land sales for foreigners, as many foreign nations have system to manage and control the allowance as to how a foreign can gain rights to property. China has a mixed system, it may claim communist, but it is of many components that have all been long altered by capitalism, but still they understand how and what needs to be controlled and managed. They know freedoms has to have managed responsibility, not "pay to do anything you want", where as American has allowed the wealthy to pay to do anything they want, and they push delusions, confusion and madness, while they bleed the system and leave the masses in a diminished living standard. President Obama tried, to push for change and say, "Let's Rebuild From the Bottom Up" and the wealthy went crazy and fueled a onslaught of racism that rivals the madness of the 1950's. Respecting China's management of data has to be given credit where credit is due.
|
